Exploring variations of the "Daddy's Little Girl" fantasy. LEGAL DISCLAIMER NSFW 18+ THIS BLOG CONTAINS SEXUALLY EXPLICIT ADULT MATERIAL. ONLY CONSENTING ADULTS ARE AUTHORIZED TO VIEW THIS BLOG. IF YOU ARE A MINOR (UNDER THE AGE OF 18), IF YOU ARE NOT OF AN AGE CONSIDERED LEGAL IN THE COUNTRY OR COMMUNITY IN WHICH YOU LIVE TO VIEW SUCH MATERIALS OR IF SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIALS OFFENDS YOU, YOU MUST LEAVE THIS BLOG IMMEDIATELY! All models displayed on this blog are believed to be 18 or over. If you find any posting on this blog that you believe depicts a minor, please click “Ask Me” and the posting will be removed immediately upon receipt. How to determine if the model in a pic is 18 or older: In the US check that the original source site of the pic includes an "18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement" on their site. This is covered by: US TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 110 - Sexual Exploitation of Children http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_110.html Sites whose models/actors merely *look* like minors but are actually adults must comply with USC 18 § 2257, which requires producers of such sites to verify that their models/actors are over the age of 18, and requires these producers to keep records of the performers name, address, age, and every name, nickname or stage alias ever used. Additionally, they must prominently display a disclaimer on the site attesting to the fact that the performers are all legally adults. TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 110 > § 2257 Record keeping requirements http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002257----000-.html What does the law say about porn in which the models appear to be under 18, but in fact are 18 or older? Up until 2002 the U.S. Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 law prohibited using youthful-looking adults or techniques such as computer-generated images to convey the impression that the models were younger (under 18), referred to as 'virtual child porn'. In April of 2002, the U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday struck down this law, indicating that the law violated the First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech and infringed on established protections of material with artistic value that does not violate community standards. Reference: CNN: Supreme Court strikes down ban on 'virtual child porn' http://archives.cnn.com/2002/LAW/04/16/scotus.virtual.child.porn/ Unless otherwise indicated, I do not own any rights to the images posted on this blog. Images shown here were found on publically accessible sites on the Internet and attribution of the source location has been provided where possible. All images are assumed to be in the public domain. Any infringement of copyright is purely unintentional. If you have any problems with any of the images or videos posted on this blog, please click “Ask Me” and leave me a comment. If you own the rights to any of the images/videos posted and do not wish them to appear here, please specify the image/video in question, and the material will be removed immediately upon presentation of proof of copyright. CONTENT This blog is about the beauty of women. My particular preferences, which are reflected in the images I post include: teens, brides, wives, drop dead gorgeous women of any age, dressed/undressed, group nudity and public nudity. If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please feel free to "Ask me Anything"